|
|
Post by nicolasd on Jul 8, 2019 11:58:23 GMT
if you have dragonpit in your holding you can choose who can tamed a dragon not a random courtesan, dragons are a powerful weapon y and you most to choose wisely who can use it well
|
|
|
|
Post by lordumber93 on Jul 30, 2019 12:01:36 GMT
Except dragons are sentient beings with near human levels of intelligent. They pick their riders, not you.
|
|
|
|
Post by galrun on Jul 30, 2019 12:04:50 GMT
The dragons choose who will succeed, but the question is about who the lord of the dragonpit will allow to try it ;-)
|
|
|
|
Post by Visi on Aug 17, 2019 0:52:00 GMT
Except dragons are sentient beings with near human levels of intelligent. They pick their riders, not you. Debatable. |
|
|
|
Post by Elotyr on Aug 17, 2019 2:54:53 GMT
Except dragons are sentient beings with near human levels of intelligent. They pick their riders, not you. Debatable. Come on now! Debatable? Drogon proved it in the final of Season 8, demonstrating how he hated feudalism by burning the throne, then took his mom and got away to honor her in the Valyrian ways! All joking aside Nettles in the Dance kind of proves that dragons care who hides them as much as horses do, she just feed Sheepstealer some sheep for a time and the dragon was like "Ok You are cool." Oakenfist scars in the other end shows a dragon can choose someone with (Maybe) no dragon blood ratter than a dragon seed. So yes galrun is right. The Dragon choose the rider, but the lord of the Dragon Pit pick who the dragon can choose. |
|
|
|
Post by Karl on Aug 18, 2019 23:50:36 GMT
Come on now! Debatable? Drogon proved it in the final of Season 8, demonstrating how he hated feudalism by burning the throne, then took his mom and got away to honor her in the Valyrian ways! All joking aside Nettles in the Dance kind of proves that dragons care who hides them as much as horses do, she just feed Sheepstealer some sheep for a time and the dragon was like "Ok You are cool." Oakenfist scars in the other end shows a dragon can choose someone with (Maybe) no dragon blood ratter than a dragon seed. So yes galrun is right. The Dragon choose the rider, but the lord of the Dragon Pit pick who the dragon can choose. I think he was referring to "near human levels of intelligent" as the debatable part. I mean, he did bold it and all.  |
|
|
|
Post by Elotyr on Aug 18, 2019 23:59:51 GMT
Come on now! Debatable? Drogon proved it in the final of Season 8, demonstrating how he hated feudalism by burning the throne, then took his mom and got away to honor her in the Valyrian ways! All joking aside Nettles in the Dance kind of proves that dragons care who hides them as much as horses do, she just feed Sheepstealer some sheep for a time and the dragon was like "Ok You are cool." Oakenfist scars in the other end shows a dragon can choose someone with (Maybe) no dragon blood ratter than a dragon seed. So yes galrun is right. The Dragon choose the rider, but the lord of the Dragon Pit pick who the dragon can choose. I think he was referring to "near human levels of intelligent" as the debatable part. I mean, he did bold it and all. Yes i got that, the first phrase in my post was a reference to the near near human levels of intelligence that was demonstrated in the show, as a joke, and my second was pointing out that from what we get in the books they "Chossing of the rider" is more in the lines of a horse level of intelligence than a human. Just the last part was about the whole thread not his point of debate specifically. Sorry if i didn't expressed myself properly  |
|
|
|
Post by Karl on Aug 19, 2019 0:15:24 GMT
I think he was referring to "near human levels of intelligent" as the debatable part. I mean, he did bold it and all. Yes i got that, the first phrase in my post was a reference to the near near human levels of intelligence that was demonstrated in the show, as a joke, and my second was pointing out that from what we get in the books they "Chossing of the rider" is more in the lines of a horse level of intelligence than a human. Just the last part was about the whole thread not his point of debate specifically. Sorry if i didn't expressed myself properly Ah, ok. I'm not sure if the error was your expression or my comprehension, but both of them are good enough this time around.  Thanks for explaining! |
|
Thanks for explaining!